Aldi gets high marks in ‘Supermarket Experience Study’

Press enter to search
Close search
Open Menu

Aldi gets high marks in ‘Supermarket Experience Study’

12/14/2017
Aldi shoppers give value for money the highest marks, and also score Aldi higher than supermarkets on checkout speed.

In its “2017 U.S. Supermarket Experience Study,” The Retail Feedback Group (RFG) found that while supermarkets receive the strongest marks in quality and variety, Aldi has a decided advantage in value for the money and a slight edge in the checkout experience. Also, millennials gave lower ratings than older shoppers in every aspect of the supermarket visit.

Here are some key findings:

• Supermarket shoppers gave an overall satisfaction (OSAT) rating of 4.42 on a five-point scale before 3 p.m., but this mark fell to 4.36 between 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. Several factor ratings were substantially lower after 3 p.m. than earlier in the day, including cleanliness, quality/freshness, staff friendliness and value for the money.
• Supermarket shoppers rated quality/freshness of the food and groceries (4.45) and cleanliness of the store (4.40) as the two strongest core experience factors. Associate friendliness — the highest-rated service factor — received a more moderate rating of 4.34, followed by associate helpfulness/knowledge (4.24), checkout speed/efficiency (4.23) and associate availability (4.19).

• While supermarkets score well on general variety and selection (4.38), scores register lower on natural and organic items (4.05), ethnic/international products (3.97), allergen-free items (3.97) and locally sourced items (3.96).
• Receiving the lowest score among all core experience factors, value for the money spent on this visit registered at 4.18. Drilling down deeper, the results show meat prices (3.98), produce prices (4.03) and everyday prices (4.03) all generated low scores in the supermarket channel while advertised sales items scored much higher (4.38). Note that 76 percent of shoppers refer to one or more advertising/sales vehicles — traditional, social, mobile and digital — before or during the visit.

“These survey findings point to a critical need for grocery retailers with a physical presence to step up their game,” Doug Madenberg, principal for RFG, noted. “When people shop in a supermarket, the overall experience, assortment and value proposition need to be excellent in order to earn their next visit. There are too many grocery options available online, in hard discount stores and across other formats for an average or sub-par supermarket visit to be acceptable."

Aldi making inroads; Walmart scores lowest
Shoppers who visited an Aldi in the last 60 days are more likely to recommend the store (4.54 on a five-point scale) than supermarket shoppers, who give an average rating of (3.66). Further, 33 percent of those who shopped at Aldi say they plan to shop there more than now in the next 12 months versus 21 percent for supermarket shoppers and just 10 percent for Walmart. In core experience ratings, Aldi shoppers give value for money the highest marks (4.68), and also score Aldi higher than supermarkets on checkout speed (4.30). Walmart shoppers give lower scores on the all the core experience factors.

Low marks from millennials
Millennials scored supermarkets the lowest on all core experience factors, as well as overall trip satisfaction. Boomers, on the other hand, rated overall trip experience and nearly all core experience factors highest.

“The fact that overall trip satisfaction and all of the core experience factors register lowest among millennials should be a call to action for supermarkets,” RFG’s Brian Numainville said. “Traditional supermarkets must find ways to make the supermarket more appealing and relevant to younger shoppers or risk becoming endangered as boomers age and purchase less."

Meal kit usage and experience
Overall, just 14 percent of all supermarket shoppers tried a meal kit delivery service in the last year, but millennials showed stronger trial versus Gen X or boomers. Blue Apron, Home Chef and Hello Fresh were the three services used most. Top reasons for meal kit usage were home delivery (46 percent) and to save time (45 percent). Of those who did not use a meal kit, the main reasons were that they were too expensive (48 percent) or there was no interest in meal kits (44 percent). Meal kit users were most satisfied with quality of ingredients (83 percent highly satisfied) and least impressed with value for the money spent (65 percent highly satisfied).

Overall, 15 percent of shoppers also indicated their primary supermarket has a meal kit offering. Of those who purchased a meal kit from their primary supermarket, the top reasons given were good value (54 percent), quality of ingredients (53 percent) and to save time (51 percent).

Grocery retailers and food distributors can obtain a free copy of the full report from the Retail Feedback Group by e-mailing the RFG at [email protected]. The study is based on a nationally representative study of 1,200 supermarket shoppers.